"All mankind is one author, and is one volume; when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and ever chapter must be so translated..." (John Donne)
I've been reading in article in Harper's Magazine (2007 edition) called "The Ecstasy of Influence" in which Jonathan Lethem notes that a number of the books in the so called "Canon" are variations on early books or ideas. Some call this stealing; others call this writing with influence. Does the notion that everything has already been written mean we can't produce anything original? Has every story been told?
Remember the game where you would sit in a circle and whisper an idea to each other and then each person would repeat the story, passing it around the circle. The last person to hear the story had to recount the story so that participants could hear how the story had been, sometimes, totally rewritten. To some degree, literature is like that. We read, and then we write, but is what we write original or is it rewriting a prior idea or story that we have heard or read elsewhere? Is there anything wrong with this; does it constitute plagiarism or is that something completely different?
Are you a writer who depends on influence?
Download From Youtube Video High Quality
6 years ago